|
|
|
Back to 2014 Annual Meeting Abstracts
Racial Differences in Ischemic Complications of Pedicled versus Free Abdominal Flaps for Breast Reconstruction
Cindy Wu, MD1, John L. Clayton, MD, PhD, MPH2, Eric G. Halvorson, MD3. 1University of North Carolin, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2Intermountain Plastic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose To determine the relationship between race and ischemic complications in women undergoing breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM (pTRAM) and perforator flaps (DIEP). Materials and Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study of women who underwent breast reconstruction utilizing either pTRAM or DIEP flaps from March 1, 2002 to September 1, 2012 was performed. Clinical and demographic variables, including race and ischemic complications (mastectomy flap necrosis, fat necrosis, partial abdominal flap necrosis, vascular compromise requiring reoperation) were examined. Fat necrosis was graded using a previously established scale (Grade I = radiologically visible, II = palpable, III = palpable and visible, IV = symptomatic). Results Over the 10-year study period, adequate follow up was available for 138 women (94 Caucasian, 36 African-American) who underwent pTRAM or DIEP. Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in the pTRAM group (53.5% vs. 17.4%, p <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in partial flap necrosis or mastectomy flap necrosis between the two groups. The DIEP group had a higher rate of vascular compromise requiring reoperation (13% vs. 0, p = 0.003). In the pTRAM group, there was a higher rate of fat necrosis (77% vs. 45.6%, p <0.001) and Grade IV fat necrosis in African-Americans (42.8% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.005). Rates of other ischemic complications were comparable between the two racial groups. In the DIEP group, ischemic complications were comparable between the two racial groups. After stratifying by flap type and race, we saw no differences in mastectomy flap necrosis (p = 0.0182). Discussion African-Americans undergoing pTRAM flap are at higher risk for Grade IV fat necrosis but not mastectomy flap necrosis or partial flap necrosis. This may be due to difficulty using physical examination to judge the vascular status of a pedicle flap that is known to undergo significant changes in vascular physiology following transfer. Intraoperative assessment of perfusion using new technologies may be useful in these higher risk patients.
Back to 2014 Annual Meeting Abstracts
|
|