Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons

NESPS Home NESPS Home Past & Future Meetings Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2024 Posters


Predictors of Postoperative Dilation Difficulty in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty Patients
Peter Shamamian1, Anya Wang1, Subha Karim1, Derek Chen1, Carol Wang1, Keisha Montalmant1, Avra Laarakker2, John Pang3, Ann Tran2, Bella Avanessian2, Jess Ting2, Elan Horesh2
1Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA; 2Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, USA; 3Align Surgical Associates, USA

Background: A necessary component of postoperative care in most gender-affirming vaginoplasty is dilation of the neovaginal canal. The process is time-consuming and requires significant instruction. Difficulty with dilation can cause patient pain and distress, often decreasing compliance. This can lead to partial or complete closure of the neovaginal canal. This study sought to evaluate the sociodemographic, operative, and comorbid characteristics that contribute to patient difficulty with neovaginal dilation. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing gender-affirming vaginoplasty between June 2019 and July 2023 was carried out. The primary outcome was consistent dilation difficulty reported during follow-up clinic visits for any reason, including discomfort, pain, or understanding of instructions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare characteristics and outcomes of each group. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: In total, 614 patients were included in the study, 506 (82.5%) patients had no dilation difficulty, and 108 (17.5%) had dilation difficulty. Medicare insurance status (p=0.007), unemployment (p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (p=0.019), HIV (p<0.001), psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (p=0.048), and primary peritoneal vaginoplasty (p=0.019) were associated with postoperative dilation difficulty. Multiple logistic regression revealed higher odds of dilation difficulty in patients who are unemployed (OR 2.740, 95% CI 1.587-4.732, p<0.001), have HIV (OR 2.588, 95% CI 1.290-5.190, p=0.007), have a psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.001-2.577, p=0.049), or received a primary peritoneal flap (OR 3.202, 95% CI 1.212-8.460, p=0.019). Conclusion: The risk of dilation difficulty may be associated with multiple aspects of the care spectrum, including social factors, psychiatric comorbidity, and operative technique. Understanding these risks and continued encouragement of dilation is critical to optimizing patient outcomes and dilation success.

Table 1. Multiple logistic regression of preoperative and intraoperative characteristics associated with dilation difficulty.


Back to 2024 Posters