Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons

NESPS Home NESPS Home Past & Future Meetings Past & Future Meetings

Back to 2026 Abstracts


Outcomes of Free Flap Breast Reconstruction at Academic vs Non-Academic Centers.
Alan T. Makhoul*, Said Azoury
Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Background: Free flap breast reconstruction is increasingly being practiced in non-academic settings. The outcomes of free tissue transfer in academic and non-academic settings have not been adequately compared.

Methods: The TriNetX USA Research Network, a de-identified database containing records from 67 healthcare organizations, was queried using CPT code 19364 to identify patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction at an academic or non-academic medical center between 2011-2025. Propensity score matching (1:1, nearest-neighbor) was performed to create two balanced cohorts controlling for age, race, BMI, tobacco history, type II diabetes history, tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification, and radiation history. Three-year post-operative outcomes were evaluated via CPT and ICD-10 codes and compared using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: 114,652,735 records were queried, yielding 7,965 patients treated at an academic center and 829 patients treated at a non-academic center. Post-matching, characteristics were similar between the academic (n = 814) and non-academic (n = 814) cohorts. No differences in free flap complication rates were observed, including flap failure, hematoma, seroma, fluid collection drainage, dehiscence, infection, or operative debridement (Table 1). Post-operative atelectasis was more common in the academic cohort (OR 1.67, CI 1.10-2.52, p = .014), and incisional hernia was more common in the non-academic cohort (OR .532, CI .302-.938, p = .027). No differences in pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, kidney failure, or sepsis rates were observed.

Conclusion: Outcomes of free flap breast reconstruction are similar between academic and non-academic settings. Performing free tissue transfer without trainee involvement or the resources of an academic center does not negatively impact patient or flap outcomes. Post-operative hernia was more common among patients treated at a non-academic center, suggesting differing approaches to donor site management.
Three-Year Post-Operative Outcomes.
 Academic,
n (%)
Non-academic,
n (%)
Odds Ratio
(95% CI, P-value)
N814814 
Flap outcomes   
Flap failure17 (2.09)11 (1.35)1.56 (.725-3.35, .253)
Seroma33 (4.05)31 (3.81)1.07 (.647-1.76, .799)
Hematoma13 (1.60)23 (2.83).558 (.281-1.11, .092)
Collection drainage30 (3.29)40 (4.91).740 (.456-1.20, .221)
Dehiscence105 (12.9)103 (12.7)1.02 (.764-1.37, .882)
Infection71 (8.72)80 (9.83).877 (.627-1.23, .442)
Operative debridement59 (7.25)56 (6.88)1.06 (.724-1.55, .771)
Incisional hernia19 (2.33)35 (4.30).532 (.302-.938, .027)*
Patient outcomes   
Atelectasis63 (7.74)39 (4.79)1.67 (1.10-2.52, .014)*
Pneumonia21 (2.58)25 (3.07).836 (.464-1.51, .550)
Deep vein thrombosis28 (3.44)21 (2.58)1.34 (.755-2.39, .314)
Pulmonary embolism15 (1.84)13 (1.60)1.16 (.548-2.45, .698)
Urinary tract infection27 (3.32)39 (4.79).644 (.390-1.06, .083)
Sepsis16 (1.97)27 (3.32).584 (.312-1.09, .089)
Kidney failure21 (2.58)19 (2.33)1.11 (.591-2.08, .749)

CI, confidence interval. Cell counts fewer than 10 were suppressed in accordance with TriNetX data privacy requirements; p-values for these comparisons were therefore not available. Statistically significant p-values are shown with an asterisk.
Back to 2026 Abstracts